FPS Drops

Get support for Unvanquished.
User avatar
KenuR
Tyrant
Posts: 369
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:54 pm UTC

Re: FPS Drops

Post by KenuR »

Yeah... you guys need to make a lot more promotional pictures that look as good as this one.

User avatar
ViruS
Granger
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:24 am UTC
Location: Antartica - West Australian Post shore
Contact:

Re: FPS Drops

Post by ViruS »

SHINY DROOLS
btw, where's the shadows? If that's vanilla, well then something's wrong with my client.

ImageImageYou[TubeImage

User avatar
kharnov
Granger
Posts: 1851
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:54 pm UTC
Clan: GT
Location: New York City

Re: FPS Drops

Post by kharnov »

That's GL3.

Forty-Two
Mantis
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:08 pm UTC
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: FPS Drops

Post by Forty-Two »

I just thought of your beta goals, and particularly this:

II. Replacing all of the Tremulous assets.

For this condition, we'll need to replace all of the Tremulous artwork that we've inherited. Naturally, the first thing that comes to mind would be the models, which we've been replacing with each of our releases. Of course, we'll need to redo all of the sounds as well, both for players and ambient effects. We'll also need to create our own set of map textures for mappers to use, since the texture set in Tremulous is of a much lower resolution than we'd like. Lastly, even the more subtle things like explosion and gib effects need to be completely redone.

What does this mean for the low poly models?

0 = 0
Quod erat demonstrandum.

User avatar
Ishq
Project Head
Posts: 1147
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:32 pm UTC

Re: FPS Drops

Post by Ishq »

Chances are they will stick around. We only mean to replace the trem low poly models as the default model. If we have time and artists have enough interest to make really low poly versions of our current models, that could potentially be arranged too.

User avatar
velociostrich
Dragoon
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:24 pm UTC

Re: FPS Drops

Post by velociostrich »

Ishq wrote:

If we have time and artists have enough interest to make really low poly versions of our current models, that could potentially be arranged too.

We should probably make low(-er) poly models regardless at some point just to have dynamic LOD.

Post Reply